NOTE: I recently indulged in reading a series on Substack by Mark Bisone (The Cat was Never Found) about God and Satan/the Devil. I highly recommend all of his works, but this one intrigues me at a deep level. So, I’m going to share some of my own perspectives, not to challenge Mark (he seems to challenge himself often enough without need for my provocation!), but to offer insights that I have been perceiving, reviewing, and continuing to question since childhood. I’ll be honest that I’m going to discuss some pretty controversial topics early on in this piece, so be warned, although I doubt that you’ve never heard such claims before!
As my long-time readers may already know, I was the family weirdo. Yes, I wore plaid pants along with flower-pattern shirts. Yep, I completely covered my eyes for an entire weekend and roamed throughout the house and yard to experience blindness. And heck yeah, I patiently embroidered words on the soles of my feet with a needle and colored thread (no infections incurred). I even pierced my own ears — well, only my left ear, but four times.
As such, it is probably no surprise that my Charm-Schooled mother used to lament that I never outgrew the “Why?” stage of my early years.
I continued to wonder about her same old answers, “Because that’s the way we’ve always done it,” and “Because I said so.” I asked so many questions that my parents regularly sent me to my room (or I ran there of my own accord).
For example, when I was a young schoolgirl, some of the boys in my class would chase me incessantly on the playground. They called me terrible names, stole my belongings, and even pulled my hair and pinched me. The recess ladies always turned away from them as they tormented me. One night at the family dinner table, my parents asked about my day in school and I finally told them about the boys’ cruelty. My father and siblings said nothing and continued to eat.
My mother, however, laughed out loud. Shaking her head while looking directly into my eyes, she said to me, "Oh, honey, the boys do that because they like you!"
I was astounded at this ridiculous answer. Trying to keep tears from welling up in my eyes, I said, "Well, when I want to show someone I like them, I treat them nice." She continued trying to convince me, in some kind of programmed "Mother knows best" language, that teasing (read: hurting) each other is okay and — even worse — that it’s a sign of true affection.
I said: “It’s not right! What is wrong with this place?”
Once again, I was sent to my room for defying my mother.
So. Many. Tears.
But I’m not here to look for sympathy, nor to offer any to Satan/the Devil, who I imagine would also be much happier for me to stop asking questions!
Instead, I want to talk about why my questioning, research, experience, logical reasoning, and intuition have led me to the tripartite conclusion that:
The Divine Creator (God) did not create the Devil/Satan/Lucifer;
We are being manipulated into believing that learning painful lessons is "necessary" for us to evolve into more loving beings; and
The Devil/Satan/Lucifer — along with another "feminine" dark-sider — are actually disharmonious anti-Life energetic signatures that nearly destroyed our Earthly Paradise and continue to wreak havoc here.
But first, I want to commend Mark Bisone for his treatise on God and the Devil.
Part 3 is rich with literary, historical, and artistic exemplars — and even academic theories such as Christopher Langan’s “Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe” — that help to form Mark’s self-described “cosmological model,” which is HUGE. I highly recommend that you start by reading Part 1 followed by Part 2 and then Part 3, but if you are well-versed in these topics, go ahead and dive in to the waters of Part 3, because you’ll be in familiar territory with, undoubtedly, some new thought-provoking, well-reasoned billboards of wisdom along the way. And, you can always return to the earlier segments if you feel lost or are simply riveted by Mark’s writing, as I am.
Speaking of diving in, I’m ready! But first, a proviso:
Rather than break down each of the separate components of my conclusion, please allow me to just “riff.” As a musician who can read written music and improvise vocally and on several instruments, I’m going with improvisation here, because I like to get into a flow when I tell stories. (And, as Mark and I both agree, our stories are deeply important to the future that we experience!) I’m going to start with some observations.
TRUSTING OUR SENSES
I have lived in Southern and Central California for nearly 35 years. Whenever I have visited mountainous areas for hiking, canoeing, and camping, or while simply driving through the state on various roads, I have noticed a strange phenomenon which is associated with a relevant number:
There are consistent striations in the rocks that initially appeared to me to be 22.5 degrees off from level Earth. I assumed this because 22.5 is half of a 45 degree angle, which is one-eighth of a full circle. Since many people think of planetary and/or cosmic concerns in terms of circles, my guesstimate seemed to make basic sense.
But in early 2022 — based on some very pointed questions by a fellow who I’ll call "The Old Geometer" — I did some research and found that
1) I was correct that there is off-kilter-ness, but also
2) I was incorrect because the number is actually 23.5 degrees askew, and I had also incorrectly accepted the notion of Earth spinning on an axis with her “top end” called the North Pole that pointed to Polaris, the North Star, and that it no longer does, and this all led to exposing a third misconception:
A crucial thing that I was getting wrong is the assumption of a globe Earth.
There is no "axis pointing to the North Star," because Earth is flat and static, and the Sun, Moon, and Stars move around Her. We are not living on a ball that spins at 1,000+ miles per hour (that alone is ridiculous for so many reasons). The North Pole is not at the top of "globe Earth," it is Her geographic center. I can no longer believe in the "globe Earth" theory, based on multiple, actual scientific experiments and sound logic.
So the 23.5 degrees is still important, but it’s not related to a fictitious globe-and-axis as we have been told. I will talk more about this in a separate article.
Since my initial observations, everywhere I have traveled — throughout California, Arizona, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Missouri, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona — I see the same 23.5º angle on display in the rock formations. What’s up with that?
“Move along, child. It’s always been that way.”
But it hasn’t always been that way. In fact, "the early Greek philosophers considered the tilt of the earth to be an unnatural and “irregular condition” and not something that had been in existence since the beginning of creation." Again, "tilt of the Earth" must logically refer to the signs of upheaval in mountains, since we can only see and then measure the 23.5º angle based on Sea Level (See Level).
You can find and read the full quote in the following article online:
https://www.meta-religion.com/World_Religions/Ancient_religions/Egypt/235_degrees.htm
Prior to my travels, I had already heard and read stories from Scandinavian peoples and from Native tribes on every continent, who all told of a planetary disaster many millennia ago.
The Cataclysm described was a sudden event that traumatized Mother Earth and all Her Divine inhabitants, immediately introducing decrepitude and death, which had never before been imagined, let alone experienced. Horror, suffering, decay, and brutal death was not part of our sacred life until the Cataclysm, which also resulted in the upheaval of Earth and which we can still see in the 23.5 degrees off-kilter-ness. For this reason, I will call it The Primary Trauma.
The article linked above even gives examples of art, literature, and architecture created by people the world over throughout history, and the author states:
"…it appears that the people who have been placing these references to the angle of 23.5º in many different sources throughout history are telling us that the tilt is associated with 'death’."
(To clarify, the Cataclysm itself is associated with death, as there is no tilt; there is destruction visible in the shifted rocks. Yes, some of the mountains move directly upward or are shifted by more than 23.5 degrees, but the general movement is of that angle.)
Still, seeing for myself these monstrous upheavals of Mother Earth all around the country was astonishing, not only because of the consistent 23.5º issue, but because what we have all been inculcated to see as "beautiful" and "awe-inspiring," I started to see as the horrific near-destruction of Earth itself and all her inhabitants.
And of course, the question arises: Why would the government-sponsored educators, “scientists,” and other “experts” lie to us, saying that water, wind, volcanoes, and random earthquakes did this earth-wide destruction? And further, exactly how could all these “random” processes achieve the same 23.5 degree upheaval?
What is “in it” for them to perpetuate such misleading information?
Well, I think I’d like to tangent off the curve, so to speak, in order to help answer that question . . . with numbers.
The Importance of 4 and 7 and 47 in Relation to 23.5
That number — 23.5 — is precisely half of the whole number 47. Four (4) and seven (7) happen to be the most stable yet expansive numbers between 1 and 10. We don’t count zero (0) because it’s merely a placeholder; we can’t count "nothing." According to "The Old Geometer" (bracketed text is mine, for clarity only):
An example of the importance of 4 and 7 vs [the much touted Tesla] 3,6 (9) is in fractal derivation, expansion. So let's start with 4 and 7 (two numbers between 1-10), and use only addition and subtraction, to expand a series (though excluding negatives).
1, only 4,7:
4+7 = 11
7-4 = 3
Result: 3,4,7,11
Let's start with 3 and 6 (two numbers between 1-10)
1, only 3,6:
3+6 = 9
6-3 = 3
Result: 3,3,6,9
Right off the bat, you have NO EXPANSION beyond the bounds, redundancy, and far less "solving" ability.
If you continue with those two series, you will notice the 4 and 7 QUICKLY gets way more unique and expands significantly more than the supposed tesla garbage, with FAR less redundancy.
So let's see that (I'm gonna remove duplicates to make it more obvious):
2, from 3,4,7,11:
3+7 = 10
3+11 = 14
4+11 = 15
7+11 = 18
4-3 = 1
11-3 = 8
Result: 1,3,4,7,8,10,11,14,15,18
2, from 3,3,6,9:
3+9 = 12
6+9 = 15
3-3 = 0
Result: 0,3,6,9,12,15
Which looks more interesting and complete to you?
So anyway, THAT is why there is focus on the 3,6,9 idiocy, because it's MEANINGLESS AND IRRELEVANT, [IT IS] MISDIRECTION. And of course, [that focus is] practically willful ignorance of 4 and 7 to go with that, just like EVERYTHING else in WORTHLESS "freemason" "societies."
What I am getting at (based on what The Old Geometer is showing) is that 4 and 7 are the numbers of creation and expansion, of beauty and harmony. Together — as 47 — they not only symbolize but actually encode the Divine Order. Splitting that number in half makes 23.5.
I now comprehend that 3-6-9 psychopaths with disharmonious frequencies used their bad maths to initiate the split on purpose to promote their fractionated, superfluous copy-catting, which is a mockery of our creative nature. Their invasion of Earth induced the horrific conditions for them to assume a position of power over the planet and all life, based on fear, division, and decrepitude.
The Cataclysm turned our attention toward THEM, and therefore AWAY from our Divine lives, and THEY never stopped basking in the adoration.
Over decades, through my real-world research combined with my in-tuition, it makes sense to me that Earth was created by the Divine Creator (God) as a self-sustaining, total nurturing home for us as His Children.
We had subtle bodies of a silicate matrix. We did not need clothing or external sources of heat or cooling because the temperature on Earth was always pleasant. We did not require food because we were fed by the Sun’s loving light, and plants provided abundant manna if we chose to eat for pleasurable sustenance or to connect with specific aspects of Earthly plant-energy components. We created more flowers and leafy plants to beautify the Earth. Everything was plentiful and we wanted for nothing, and so our lives were about care-fully creating in service to the Divine Creator based on our individual desires.
My inner comprehension is that our lives here on Earth lasted as long as we wanted them to, and that our “marriages” entailed finding a suitable partner for procreating and parenting, and/or for making music and art, designing and building homes and other structures, gardening, and so on. There were also no pornographic depictions of our bodies and our sexual and creative processes!
My inner perception of this Pre-Trauma Life is that it wasn’t some kind of New (c)Age lie of "love and light" existence. We needed both the sacred "intuitive" feminine aspect and the divine "doing" masculine aspect for any creation to occur. That means sparks of divine energy! And because we didn’t have anti-Life forces on Earth then, we lived simply and joyfully. The range of harmonious frequencies was all-encompassing because there was no chaos, but that certainly does not mean that life was boring.
All we need to do is imagine our ideal life. We wouldn’t need a “job” to “earn an income” because our needs would all be met. There would be no one to threaten us into giving up a portion of our creations to [supposedly] pay for social goods and services. Our time would be spent creating and caring for ourselves and our families. That’s it!
Before the Primary Trauma, we also did not have “governments,” "authorities," or "experts" because 1) intelligence, well-being, abundance were built into Life; 2) we were self-governing; and 3) we we didn’t cause any harm. All of this was an extension of the Life Force, Free Will, and our unalienable Rights that we were granted within God’s Law, also known as Natural Law, Universal Law, and Cosmic Law.
Natural Law can best be defined as "the body of universal, non-man-made, binding, and immutable laws which act as the governing dynamics for the consequences of human behavior." (H/T Mark Passio for that excellent definition.)
"Rights" are defined as "actions that do not cause harm to another sentient being." "Wrongs" are actions that do cause harm to another sentient being.
(Please bear with me on the curve because this is tangent is gathering G-forces!)
The word "unalienable" actually stems from the word "lien." Here is the etymology of "lien":
A property with a "lien" on it is held in bondage because of some kind of monetary or moral failure. But our Creator-given Rights are un-a-lien-able; a lien cannot be placed on them, nor can they be surrendered or transferred. The correct pronunciation emphasizes “lien” which is a single-syllable root word, as in “un-a-lien′-able” as opposed to the word with a hard “a” and two-syllable “li-en” that we have been taught, which makes the word sound like it comes from the root “a′-li-en” as in “foreign.”
I think it is important to note that the word “unalienable” may have been purposefully mispronounced as another black magic spell. I don’t put anything past the dark occultists.
Let’s continue. Natural Law was intelligently intended to maintain perfect harmony within individual men and women, within groups of us, and throughout Earth and all Divine Realms as God designed. Prior to the Primary Trauma, "wrongs" were not a thing because we comprised only pure Divine discerning design. It follows, then, that after the Cataclysm, man-made written laws became necessary as philosophers and spiritual adepts came to witness that our Creator-given un-a-lien′-able "rights" were being usurped over and over through psychological and physical manipulation by non-Divine energy-depleting thought-forms or "entities" embodied in supposed rulers-by-divine-right and their agents.
Despite what many disinformation agents might claim — for example, that a comet hit the Earth — the Cataclysm was no random accident. Here’s an example to help explain:
Let’s say that a super-strong gust of winter wind pushes a semi-rig into oncoming traffic in a ritzy neighborhood, causing a 40-car crash and resulting in as many people dead or seriously injured, but the truck driver is unharmed. Does the truck driver step out of his overturned cab, witness the massive destruction and death, and say, "Wow, I never intended for this to happen, but I think I’ll take this opportunity to steal these people’s wallets, purses, and expensive sunglasses"? No, he doesn’t pilfer from his fellow human beings because he has an innate sense of care for others. His mind is on helping, not harming.
To extrapolate, if a comet “accidentally” hit Earth, creating a planetary catastrophe, would surviving humans forget their inherent nature as Divine beings and start harming each other? I don’t think so.
But if anti-Life forces intentionally came to Earth to rebel against the Creator’s superlative logic and Life-affirming excellence, they would most certainly instigate violence as their modus operandi. Did this urge (or shall I say, "demi-urge") come from God? I say, No Way. Why would the designer of Life itself — of perfect concord and harmonious creation — want to bring into being a lesser, inferior idea that would then destroy Earth and enslave and desecrate His Children? This seems tragically antithetical to Divinity!
These death worshipers came with a "distinct urge" to crash into Earth at a perfectly imperfect fracturous angle and a clear intention to feed off our Life force. I suppose it is possible that they deluded them[non]selves into believing that they wanted to return to God, and simply needed some fuel in order to make the spiritual journey back.
But golly gee, that pathetic excuse sounds suspiciously like the model for every government, corporation, institution, agency, and other controlling social construct: "We’re super-powerful enough to cause bad things to happen, so now you have to give us your time and money so we can set everything right (wink-wink)." This Problem→Reaction→Solution (PRS) strategy comprises their entire playbook.
In fact, the Cataclysm was their calculated effort to destabilize Earth, siphon off our divine energy, and eventually establish this same PRS model in the Soul-Lure System of karma and reincarnation that I will talk about in Part 2, along with some other perceptions and perspectives about evil.
Meanwhile, can you feel the vampirism in the open mockery that their puppets and cushy-job-keeping career clowns constantly propagate in the media and all institutions? (See my articles here and here and here for references.)
I welcome you to share your well-thought responses to this article in the comments. And, as always, I wish you excellent health and well-being!
If you like my writing, please consider “buying me a glass of bubbles”:
buymeacoff.ee/nPAAEk1TIv
I agree on the no globe theory, but need to do a dive into the articles you referenced for the God/satan parts. Interesting idea!
I have a LOT of problems with the flat earth belief. First would be this...IF it is flat and from space looks like a giant pizza. WHERE is a single photograph showing it. Where is a single picture from someone that climbed to the top of the edge of the earth SOMEWHERE in the past millennia and drew pictures or took pictures or something.
If I look through a powerful telescope at Mars am I seeing a GLOBE or another flat place in space that is basically 2 dimensional as it has to be SOME thickness. So how THICK is the "flat earth"? They drill miles to get to oil. Is it 20 miles thick? 100? 500? at some point it become an awful thick "flat earth" that would be more like a cylindrical shaped object. What is on the OTHER flat side? And if it is flat on the top and flat on bottom what shape if you look at it from a distance are the sides? They can't be flat because flat earth people do believe that the earth is "round" but flat. So that if I were to look at it form the moon I would see a flat earth just as the moon must be flat if I'm looking at it from earth.
Am I shaking up that way of thinking at all?
Then there are the distance problems. Where is the CENTER of the flat earth. Once we can pin point that we can tell how many miles it is to other locations on the flat earth. Like if the CENTER is Washington DC (as most polytick shuns think it is) then how many miles is it to Moscow? To Bejing? To Anartica? To South Africa? To Hawaii. And if it is flat then how many miles is it from Bejing to Hawaii? How come it doesn't work out that way? Is it because we really don't know where the compass point would be on the flat earth?
No issues at all with flat earth belief...just a few hundred. Reason, logic and common sense made MY view of Earth into a globe.